MONITORING STUDY OF THE SPATIAL DYNAMICSOF BELLIGERENT-RECREATIONAL SYSTEMS(CASE STUDY OF IRPIN, HORENKA AND BUCHA)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2721.2025.94.5

Keywords:

belligerent-recreational systems, warfare, remote sensing, dNBR, dNDVI, degradation of land (vegetation) cover

Abstract

Background . The 2022 hostilities in Kyiv's suburbs (Irpin, Horenka, Bucha) triggered substantial anthropogenic environmental change and the emergence of so-called belligerent-recreational systems (BRS), where pockets of war-related destruction coexist with recreational resources. Vegetation degradation and other alterations of land cover in these areas require

detailed investigation and assessment to inform subsequent revitalization. The aim of this study was to detect spatial changes in the structure of land (vegetation) cover and to assess the degree of degradation within belligerent-recreational systems using Earth observation (remote sensing) methods by calculating spectral indices and their differenced forms.

Methods . To monitor the spatial dynamics of BRS, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 imagery was used to construct pre- and post-hostilities snapshots within the study sites. We computed the NBR (Normalized Burn Ratio) and NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) and, chiefly, their differenced forms – dNBR (Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio) and dNDVI (Differenced Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) – which reflect degrees of land-cover damage due to burning and other biomass losses. The resulting dNBR and dNDVI values were classified by damage severity (from critical to minimal). Validation of the proposed classification scales was carried out by calculating pairwise (Pearson) correlation coefficients. The results revealed a strong correlation between dNBR and dNDVI (r ≈ 0.87).

Results . Monitoring of spatial changes in BRS land-cover structure showed that the most intense fighting resulted in large-scale fires – in the northern quarters of Irpin and Bucha, and the central and eastern parts of Horenka – captured by the computed dNBR. According to dNBR, 12 % of the study area fell into the critical damage class, 20.5 % into the severe class; roughly one-third of the territory exhibited moderate damage, about one-quarter minor damage, and 9 % was almost unaffected. Analysis of dNDVI indicates that more than 80 % of biomass was lost over 13 % of the area, 50–80 % over 32 %, while 39 % experienced moderate losses and 16 % minimal losses. Additionally, NDVI analysis helped identify sites with mechanically induced vegetation damage resulting from warfare.

Conclusions . Calculating the dNBR and dNDVI spectral indices enabled a quantitative assessment and delineation of degradation levels in the land (vegetation) cover of BRS, as well as visualization of the spatial differentiation of damage by severity classes. Among these, areas with weak or moderate damage were observed to show rapid vegetation recovery, whereas zones of critical and severe damage require the implementation of robust reclamation and remediation measures. The high correlation between dNBR and dNDVI confirms the dominant role of fires in degradation; however, a combined analysis of these indices provides a more complete assessment that also captures mechanical damage. The quantitative and qualitative results of the monitoring of land-cover conditions across the study sites, together with their map-based modeling, can be used to design strategic measures for the ecological rehabilitation of areas affected by military actions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bondar, O. I., Finin, G. S., & Shevchenko, R. Y. (2022). Environmental challenges of wartime: Assessment of environmental impact using space remote sensing systems and GPS navigation. Ecological Sciences, 4(43), 40–49 [in Ukrainian]. [Бондар, О. І., Фінін, Г. С., & Шевченко, Р. Ю. (2022). Екологічні виклики воєнного часу: оцінка впливу на довкілля космічними системами дистанційного зондування та GPS навігації. Екологічні науки, 4(43), 40–49]. https://doi.org/10.32846/2306 9716/2022.eco.4-43.7

Denysyk, H. I., Kiziun, A. H., & Kanskyi, V. S. (2023). Belligerative landscapes of Ukraine. Ukrainian Geographical Journal, 3, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2023.03.023 [in Ukrainian]. [Денисик, Г. І., Кізюн, А. Г., & Канський, В. С. (2023). Белігеративні ландшафти України. Український географічний журнал, 3, 23–34]. https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2023.03.023

Grodzynskyi, M. D. (2014). Landscape ecology. Znannia [in Ukrainian]. [Гродзинський, М. Д. (2014). Ландшафтна екологія: Знання].

Janse, R. J., Hoekstra, T., Jager, K. J., Zoccali, C., Tripepi, G., Dekker, F. W., & van Diepen, M. (2021). Conducting correlation analysis: Important limitations and pitfalls. Clinical Kidney Journal, 14(11), 2332–2337. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfab085

Key, C. H., & Benson, N. C. (2021). Landscape assessment (LA) sampling and analysis methods. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RMRS‑GTR‑164‑CD, 1–55.

Lisova, N. O. (2017). Impact of military operations in Ukraine on the environmental state of the state. Scientific Notes of Ternopil National Pedagogical University. Series: Geography, 2, 165–173 [in Ukrainian]. [Лісова, Н. О. (2017). Вплив військових дій в Україні на екологічний стан держави. Наукові записки ТНПУ. Серія: Географія, 2, 165–173].

Pettorelli, N. (2013). The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199693160.001.0001

Udovychenko, V. (2017). Regional Landscape Planning: Theory, Methodology, Practice. Print-Service [in Ukrainian]. Удовиченко В. В. (2017). Регіональне ландшафтне планування: теорія, методологія, практика. Прінт-Сервіс. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332471219_Regionalne_landsaftne_planuvanna_teoria_metodologia_praktika

Udovychenko, V., & Petrovskyi, I. (2024). Restoring belligerent‑recreational systems through smart specialization tools: Challenges and opportunities. Constructive Geography and Rational Use of Natural Resources, 4(Special issue), 81–87 [in Ukrainian]. [Удовиченко В. В., Петровський І. І. (2024). Відновлення белігеративно-рекреаційних систем інструментами смарт-спеціалізації: виклики та можливості. Конструктивна географія та раціональне використання природних ресурсів, 4(спец.), 81–87]. https://doi.org/10.17721/2786‑4561.2024.4.special‑12/19

Witmer, F. D. W. (2015). Remote sensing of violent conflict: Eyes from above. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 36(9), 2326–2352. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/01431161.2015.1035412

Witmer, F. D. W., & O’Loughlin, J. (2009). Satellite data methods and application in the evaluation of war outcomes: Abandoned agricultural land in Bosnia‑Herzegovina after the 1992–1995 conflict. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99, 1033–1044. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600903260697

Woodward, R. (2014). Military landscapes. Progress in Human Geography, 38(1), 40–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513493219

Additional Files

Published

2026-01-23

How to Cite

UDOVYCHENKO, V., & PETROVSKYI, I. (2026). MONITORING STUDY OF THE SPATIAL DYNAMICSOF BELLIGERENT-RECREATIONAL SYSTEMS(CASE STUDY OF IRPIN, HORENKA AND BUCHA). Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Series in Geography, 48-56. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2721.2025.94.5