TRANSFORMATION OF BORDER COMMUNITIES: FROM A RESISTANCE IDENTITY TO A RESILIENCE IDENTITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2721.2025.95.5Keywords:
borderland, border communities, resistance identity, socio-cultural challenges, socio-cultural transformations, resilience communitiesAbstract
Background. Research on border territories exposed to adverse conditions, including those in the Chernihiv region, has gained particular importance in the context of ongoing military threats and the challenges of post-war reconstruction. These communities are highly vulnerable to external pressures, experiencing continuous socio-cultural challenges and security risks. At the same time, they have simultaneously become spaces where new identities and forms of societal resilience emerge, reshaping their socio-cultural landscape. Understanding these processes is essential both scientifically and practically, as borderlands often serve as the frontline of local mobilisation and adaptation during crises, enabling their evolution from peripheral areas into spaces of resistance.
Methods. Given the broader international scholarship on socio-cultural challenges, resistance identities, resilience communities, and socio-cultural transformation (a field that extends beyond the scope of this article), this study employs a triangulated methodological approach. It integrates classical, qualitative, and digital methods of human geography. These include cartographic and statistical analyses and fieldwork (classical methods), in-depth interviews, focus groups, and discourse analysis (qualitative methods), as well as social network analysis and digital ethnography (digital methods). By using these methods in combination, or selectively depending on the research focus, it is possible to reconstruct the lived experiences of borderland residents and trace the emerging socio-cultural orientations within these communities.
Results. A review of Ukrainian and international literature was conducted, examining the borderland as a discursive concept, socio-cultural transformations in both border and broader contexts, and the role of adverse conditions in shaping these processes. The study identifies key pre-war socio-cultural challenges and their driving factors, the specific characteristics of the 2014–2022 period, and the critical shifts that occurred after 2022. Findings show that the earlier identification ambiguity within border communities has been gradually transforming into a resistance identity. This development strengthens societal resilience, underpins the emergence of resilience communities, and drives socio-cultural change. Resilience communities are conceptualised as new socio-cultural formations that ensure continuity in borderland development under unfavourable conditions. They fulfil consolidating, integrating, adaptive, and restorative functions, influencing both the condition of border communities themselves and potentially the wider regional context.
Conclusions. The border communities of the Chernihiv region are undergoing a complex socio-cultural transformation: from long-standing challenges of peripherality and demographic decline to mobilisation, consolidation, and the formation of resilience communities during wartime and, subsequently, in the post-war period. Resistance identity plays a central role in enhancing societal resilience, while resilience communities provide the structural foundation for the functioning of society during war and for the recovery and long-term development of border territories afterwards. The results obtained are significant for human-geographical research and may form the basis for practical recommendations in regional policy and local governance.
Downloads
References
Antonenko, I. Y., & Kotiukh, Y. M. (2017). Historical and cultural heritage of the Chernihiv region: state and prospects of development. Effective economy, 11 [in Ukrainian]. [Антоненко, І. Я., & Котюх, Ю. М. (2017). Історико-культурна спадщина Чернігівської області: стан та перспективи розвитку. Ефективна економіка, 11]. https://dspace.nuft.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/02cf06cf-502e-4888-bf86-866e20340bb7/content
Bielikov, V. A. (2018). Socio-demographic transformations of peripheral areas of the northern part of Luhansk region. [Unpublished PhD dissertation]. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv [in Ukrainian]. [Бєліков, В.А. (2018). Соціально-демографічні трансформації периферійних територій північної частини Луганської області. [Неопубл. дис. канд. геогр. наук]. Київський національний університет імені Тараса Шевченка.
Brunet-Jailly, E. (2005). Theorizing Borders: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Geopolitics, 10(4), 633–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040500318449.
Giddens, A. (2000 [1999]). Runaway World: How Globalisation is Reshaping Our Lives. Brunner-Routledge.
Goodchild, M. F. (2001). GIS: A Short Introduction (pp. 5–21). Oxford University Press.
Gregory, D., Johnston, R., Pratt, G., Watts, M., & Whatmore, S. (2009). The Dictionary of Human Geography (5th ed.). (pp. 12–18, 56–62, 141–52). Wiley-Blackwell.
Main Department of Statistics in Chernihiv Region. (2025). Statistical information [in Ukrainian]. [Головне управління статистики у Чернігівській області. (2025). Статистична інформація]. https://www.chernigivstat.gov.ua/statdani/
Keck, M., & Sakdapolrak, P. (2013). What is social resilience? Lessons learned and ways forward. Erdkunde, 67(1), 5–19. University of Bonn. https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2013.01.02.
Kulieshova, H. O., (2010). Socio-geographical features of border socio-geosystems (on the example of Kharkiv region). [Unpublished PhD dissertation. Thesis for the degree of the candidate of geographical sciences in specialty 11.00.02.]. V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University [in Ukrainian]. [Кулєшова, Г.О. (2010). Суспільно-географічні особливості прикордонних соціогеосистем. (на прикладі Харківського регіону). [Неопубл. дис. канд. геогр. наук.] Харківський національний університет імені В. Н. Каразіна].
Lovell, S. A., Coen, S. E., & Rosenberg, M. W. (Eds.). (2023). The Routledge Handbook of Methodologies in Human Geography (pp. 1–29). Routledge.
Mezentsev, K. V., Pidgrushnyi, G. P., & Mezentseva, N. I., (2015). Challenges of the Post-Soviet Development of Ukraine: Economic Transformations, Demographic Changes and Socio-Spatial Polarization. In S. Henn, T. Lang, W. Sgibnev, K. Ehrlich (Eds.), Understanding Geographies of Polarization and Peripheralization. Perspectives from Central and Eastern Europe and Beyond (pp. 252–269). Palgrave Macmillan.
Mezentsev, K. V., Mezentseva, N. I., & Pidhrushnyi, G. P. (2014). Regional development in Ukraine: socio-spatial inequality and polarization (pp. 8–17, 75–79, 86–107). Print Service [in Ukrainian]. [Мезенцев, К. В., Мезенцева, Н. І., Підгрушний, Г. П. (2014). Регіональний розвиток в Україні: суспільно-просторова нерівність і поляризація (c. 8–17, 75–79, 86–107). Прінт Сервіс].
Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research (2nd ed.) (рр. 9–25). Sage Publications.
Newman, D. (2006). Borders and Bordering: Towards an Interdisciplinary Dialogue. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(2), 171–186.
O’Dowd, L. (2002). The Changing Significance of European Borders. Regional and Federal Studies, 12(4), 13–36. Routledge.
OECD. (2020). Regional Well-Being: A User Guide to the OECD Regional Well-Being Database. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecdregionalwellbeing.org.
Ohmae, K. (1990). The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Interlinked Economy. HarperBusiness.
Oliynyk, Y. B., & Hnatiuk, O. M. (2017). Territorial identity of the population of the Podillia region. VPC "Kyiv University" [in Ukrainian]. [Олійник, Я. Б., & Гнатюк, О. М. (2017). Територіальна ідентичність населення Подільського регіону. ВПЦ "Київський університет"].
Paasi, A. (1996). Boundaries as Social Processes: Territoriality in the Changing Global Order. В: Handbook of Cultural Geography, eds. Anderson K., Domosh M., Pile S., Thrift N. - Sage, London.
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data (3rd ed.) (рр. 15–32). SAGE Publications.
Thrift, N. (2008). Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect (рр. 15–36, 72–91, 128–145). Routledge.
Yuval-Davis, N. (2011). The Politics of Belonging: Intersectional Contestations (рр. 1–22, 67–95, 159–170). SAGE Publications.
Wilson, T. M., & Donnan, H. (1998). Border Identities: Nation and State at International Frontiers. Cambridge University Press.
Zhurzhenko, T. (2024). How War Is Rebordering Ukraine. Current History, 123(855), 249–255. https://online.ucpress.edu/currenthistory/article/123/855/249/203276/How-War-Is-Rebordering-Ukraine
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Людмила РИНДІЧ, асп.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Read the policy at the link: https://geography.bulletin.knu.ua/licensing_copyright
